The “Triggernometry Meets Guilty Feminist” discussion is a tragic case study in how not to engage in conversation. The guest, trapped in a self-imposed moral and epistemic cage, displays unwavering conviction despite shaky reasoning.
Here’s why it went wrong—and how to do better.
The Problem: No Dialectic, Just Dogma
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Peter Boghossian to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.