10 Comments
Apr 18, 2023·edited Apr 18, 2023Liked by Peter Boghossian

Excellent article. I have always heard the police are trained to shoot to kill because, if they don't, they will be ruthlessly killed by the law breaker, who will then go on to harm or kill other people. The police need the best possible training in law enforcement. The public need to be educated about how to support and assist the police. In particular, cooperation with the police is the best way to avoid harm. Conversely, fighting with law enforcement officers will predictably be a fatal mistake.

Expand full comment

If officers are only "shooting to stop the threat from other people," then why do they always empty every bullet in the clip? They literally unload on people even after they're no longer a threat. Or, they unload on people who are fleeing - who aren't a threat.

Police officers in the US are inadequately trained and it shows. They consistently and needlessly escalate situations that could be de-escalated if the officers didn't possess oversized egos, which they almost universally do. The over-abundance of firearms in the US makes officers nervous whenever entering a new situation, making the officers aggressive, belligerent, and trigger-happy.

Expand full comment
author

If a police officer shoots someone once, s/he cannot assume that the individual is not capable of shooting back. Similarly, just because someone is shot with a taser one cannot assume that they are incapacitated.

Expand full comment

Officers are supposed to stop firing when the suspect is down. In the heat of the moment, adrenaline gets pumping and officers empty their clips regardless of the actions of the suspect. "Officers will testify or give a statement immediately after that they fired three to four shots when they actually fired 10 to 11 shots." To me, that signals that officers are not adjusting to the needs of the situation or they're reading the situation incorrectly. That shouldn't happen. And again, it's an issue of poor training.

As armed individuals trained in the use of deadly force, officers should be calm and reserved in the use of that force. Instead, what we constantly see are officers that are aggressive, belligerent, and escalate situations that should be de-escalated. Officers are supposedly the trained professionals. But, we excuse officers of their misbehavior and expect suspects to be calm, patient, and compliant in the face of dangerous officer irrationality. This is all backwards. Officers should be the ones required to maintain their composure in the face of irrational suspects.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/26/us/why-police-shoot-so-many-rounds-trnd/index.html

Expand full comment

In a tense life or death situation, it’s really important to focus on checking your subconscious biases before shooting, and only then decide if the target should be gun hand, kneecap or center mass.

Expand full comment

Cops deserve to go home to their families after work. F*ck the idea they should risk getting shot in the head and murdered by some thug. It was a tragedy when that little Latin King was shot dead by a cop in Chicago at 3 am a few years ago. A tragedy that gangs recruit these kids and have them out shooting up their neighborhood at night and that their families have lost control. Not the cop's fault. He went home that night. Too many don't, more every year. If people want public safety they have to support those who protect and serve.

Expand full comment

The really ignorant question is "Why didn't he just shoot the gun out of his hand?" That's typically asked by people who have overdosed on cop shows.

Expand full comment
author

Correct.

Expand full comment

Agreed it’s very difficult to hit a leg BUT I’d be all for firing something similar to buckshot into a crowd at low leg level. To scatter the thugs

Expand full comment

In the 1950s the Federal Republic of Germany's police were trained to shoot at targets with the 'bullseye' on the human figure's kneecap. No IRA jokes please.

Expand full comment